Let’s say that a compliance platform is worth $12,000 per year. Does that sound expensive?
The answer is contingent on what it is replacing.
Automating the gathering of evidence in a complicated technology environment eliminates hundreds hours of tedious work, then $12,000 may be an appropriate amount to spend. If a company of seven could gather the same proof in only a few hours each month, the amount differs.
This is a good way to approach the search for the Vanta alternative. Asking which platform has the best features is not the only thing to consider. Think about what features bring your company savings in time and work.
Automated Manufacturing Comes with a Break-Even Level
Automation of compliance isn’t intrinsically beneficial or harmful. The benefit of compliance automation is dependent on the size of the business. Imagine a company in the field of technology which is growing, several cloud environments, a variety of applications and frequent changes in access. The manual process of collecting evidence can become a major administrative burden. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and take evidence are able to justify the expense.
Imagine a startup of 10 people getting ready to go through its initial SOC 2. audit. It may have a relatively tiny infrastructure, and documentation of the evidence could be managed without extensive automation.
This difference is important when evaluating Vanta’s pricing. Although an advanced platform might have a lot of features but they only have value when the organization is required by the company.
Compare Architecture Not Just Brands
Vanta Vs Drata is a debate that can easily become a feature-by-feature exercise. The two platforms are built around automation and interconnected with each other, which means that companies looking for this kind of solution can benefit by comparing the frameworks supported, their integrations and service along with individual quotes and contracts.
There’s yet another one you’ll need to make. Do you want a system for compliance that is integrated? Certain businesses want constant monitoring as well as automated evidence collection. Some companies prefer to create their own evidence, particularly when the workload is low.
Vanta Competitors Don’t Always Follow the same model
Many well-known Vanta competitors compete within a similar automation-focused category. It also offers lighter platforms designed around the organization of systems rather than a large amount of connectivity.
CertAssist fits into this category. CertAssist was designed by internal auditors as well as compliance consultants. It organizes the framework controls into a single workspace that offers editable guidelines on policies and evidence. Auditors can examine the evidence provided through a purely read interface.
It does not, in fact, connect to operating systems, nor install infrastructure agents. Customers can upload their own evidence if they want to use.
Factor System Access to the Decision
Removing integrations has an obvious drawback: you have to gather evidence manually.
This eliminates the need to integrate, and the process of compliance does not require an integration with the operating environment.
The architectures are not universally superior. What is the best choice for your company?
CertAssist is geared towards teams that comprise between five and 200 people and publishes its pricing instead of requiring the salesperson to discuss the initial figure. The price for the initial launch is $225 per month, which is a significant reduction from the standard price of $375 a month.
Let Complexity Have Its Place
Today’s needs for a startup with 10 employees are not necessarily identical to those of the company that has 100 or 500 workers.
A simple platform could be beneficial while compliance stays easy. Automation’s cost-effectiveness can grow as systems, staff and frameworks increase. This is a better way to invest in compliance technology: let complexity earn its rightful place.
Don’t buy fifty integrations merely because they appear attractive on a comparison chart. You should pay for them only when the manual job they replace becomes the more expensive option.
